Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759889
Title: How should 'informal settlement' be understood in Beijing China?
Author: Ge, Ling
ISNI:       0000 0004 7431 9073
Awarding Body: University of York
Current Institution: University of York
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 31 Aug 2020
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Informal settlements have become an essential part of urban habitation patterns both globally and in China. This research reviews the interaction of industrialisation, urbanisation, migration and the informal economy alongside institutional factors that have encouraged the development of informal settlements in Beijing. Then it asks and attempts to answer the research question: How should ‘informal settlement’ be understood in Beijing, China? This research develops the empirical study in three phases. Firstly, it explores government approaches to informal settlements and their spatial distribution in Beijing from political and academic elites’ perceptions. Secondly, it profiles the functions that different types of informal settlements perform currently in Beijing through a survey. Thirdly, it investigates the needs of informal settlement dwellers, and how Beijing fits with the global conceptual understandings of informal settlements. This research makes four key findings to our understanding of informal settlements in Beijing. First, it maps out the spatial configuration of informal settlements, which are dispersed throughout Beijing, and documents diversity in physical manifestation of informal settlements, including evolved new types and changing complications within each type. In this sense, it provides an overall picture of Beijing informal settlements geographically and typologically. Second, it expands the understanding of informal settlements that to define the informal is not only determined by norms, regulations or laws, but also by the extent to which they are enforced; and the intensity of their enforcement depends on how government officials choose to interpret policies. Third, it suggests informal settlements satisfy dweller’s housing need because they are merely a sleeping place rather than home, and dwellers care more about socio-economic needs such as earning/saving money and social networks. Finally, it predicts the unstoppable trend of informal settlements in Beijing considering the enormous income gap between urban and rural China, together with the existence of informal economy.
Supervisor: Watson, Sabrina (Hongxia) ; Snell, Carolyn Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.759889  DOI: Not available
Share: