Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.757874
Title: A linguistic analysis of dated poems from the book of Taliesin
Author: Sadler, Benjamin
ISNI:       0000 0004 7430 6838
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The lack of surviving Welsh vernacular manuscripts from before the thirteenth century, and the general scarcity of Welsh-language material elsewhere from that early period, has meant a great deal of controversy around those texts which may be early but are found in later manuscripts. The confidence with which many texts were given early dates has disappeared, and even those texts for which early dates are still proposed meet with varying levels of scepticism. Work has been done to develop our understanding of the language's historical developments, however Haycock has remarked that it is something of an embarrassment that there exists no agreed and dependable set of linguistic criteria for pre-c. 1100 verse. This thesis takes five poems from the fourteenth-century Book of Taliesin, for which dates have been offered between the ninth and eleventh centuries, on the basis of their historical context. The same scribal hand copied four other manuscripts, the contents of which date from the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The language of the poems is analysed, using the language of the other manuscripts as a linguistic control, informed by other scholarship, to assess the survival of archaic forms through the process of subsequent redaction to arrive at the Book of Taliesin. The main finding of the thesis is that the language of all five surviving manuscripts by the Book of Taliesin scribe presents a largely uniform picture. There are a handful of examples that do diverge from the scribal norm. If the dates given to the poems are accepted, the evidence points to extensive redaction, removing those forms that had become unfamiliar or out-of-date. In this scenario, there should be no embarrassment that early texts cannot be dated on the basis of their linguistic features: the language of early texts may have been so altered as to appear contemporary to texts many centuries their junior.
Supervisor: Williams, Mark ; Koch, John ; Russell, Paul ; Rodway, Simon Sponsor: Sir John Rhys Fund
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.757874  DOI: Not available
Share: