Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.755974
Title: The stamped wheel-turned pottery of fourth century Britain and its relationship to the stamped hand-made pottery of the post-Roman period in Britain
Author: Briscoe, D. C.
ISNI:       0000 0004 7428 9310
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2015
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The thesis seeks to discern possible reasons for the reappearance of stamped wheel-turned pottery in fourth-century Roman Britain; to establish whether the stamp motifs demonstrate regional or local variations; to attempt to identify sources of inspiration for the motifs; and lastly to test whether it is possible to demonstrate the ongoing usage of motifs from the fourth century to the fifth and sixth. It has grown out of work for the Archive of Anglo-Saxon Pottery Stamps (or AASPS, a project to record every stamp impression on early Anglo-Saxon ceramics). I became interested in ‘Romano-Saxon’ pottery when making casts for AASPS. It soon became apparent that Romano-Saxon pottery was only a small section of the fourth-century stamping tradition and this PhD gave me the opportunity to study it in depth. The first chapter describes past research in this area and the third considers what is known of the history of Britain in the fourth century, while Chapter 2 explains the methods used in the analyses. Chapter 4 presents earlier episodes of stamped pottery to demonstrate that they did not inspire the fourth century’s potters. Chapter 5 considers the production centres from which this pottery came and endeavours to identify when they ceased production. Chapter 6 introduces the Corpus of Stamped Pottery, presented in Volume 2. Chapter 7 analyses the distribution of wares while Chapter 8 analyses the distribution of specific motifs in the two periods. Chapter 9 considers pottery production in the post-Roman period and compares and contrasts motif usage. Chapter 10 presents some case-studies of motifs in the hope of clarifying whether their use may have some symbolic meaning. The conclusions are that there are major regional differences in usage in both periods, but that at some specific sites the ongoing employment of motif/s can be reasonably demonstrated.
Supervisor: Orton, C. ; Reynolds, A. Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.755974  DOI: Not available
Share: