Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.747137
Title: Do goals facilitate conscious awareness of goal-related information?
Author: Rochal, Irina
ISNI:       0000 0004 7228 5762
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Prior research suggests that people’s behaviour and perception can be strongly biased by their current goals. This can occur without people being necessarily consciously aware of that. This idea implies that at least some information would have to be preconsciously processed to a specific degree, in order for the brain to decide what is goal-relevant and what is not. With this theory in mind, I investigated whether motivation could exert a top-down influence on what type of information would enter conscious awareness first and in particular, whether goal-related information would have conscious priority. This was done by using a state of mind technique called continuous flash suppression (CFS). I proposed that motivation affects perception and behaviour by top-down influences that occur via accessibility. In my first experiment, I tested motivational top-down effects of goals on goal-related materials (EXP 1), by inducing deprivation that should create a goal to fulfil. After sobering results I took a few steps back on the motivational – behaviour chain and tested a) top-down effect on a low-level basis (EXP 2), b) top-down effects of accessibility of concepts (EXP 3, EXP 4), and c) top-down effects on semantics (EXP 5). My results suggest that expected information, which is instrumental for the task at hand, is prioritized in conscious awareness (EXP 2). Moreover, these findings can be extended to accessible concepts that are not instrumental for the task but are simply accessible for goal pursuit (EXP 3,4). Lastly, the results of experiment 5 imply that previously found accessibility effects of concepts, are not due to familiarity but could be possible due to higher-level preconscious processing. This gives rise to the possibility that semantic processing might be possible. The meaning and implication of those results will be further elaborated on in the general discussion.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.747137  DOI: Not available
Share: