Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.745576
Title: Born to rule the seas : the Navy during Andrew Jackson's presidency and the genesis of American naval power
Author: Berube, Claude
ISNI:       0000 0004 7225 7331
Awarding Body: University of Leeds
Current Institution: University of Leeds
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 Jul 2023
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The 1830s is an overlooked period in American naval history, overshadowed by the more popular and active War of 1812 and Civil War. Nevertheless, the personnel, operations, technologies, policies, and vision of the Navy of that era, which was emerging from the Age of Sail, are important components of its evolution, setting it on the long path to its status as a global maritime power. The decade also dispels any notion that Andrew Jackson was ambivalent toward the Navy. By Andrew Jackson’s inauguration in 1829, the Navy had engaged with two major powers, defended American shipping, conducted anti-piracy operations, and provided long-term, overseas presence. It had not, however, changed much since it had first engaged with a European power in the Quasi-War. The Navy began to transform during Jackson’s administration due in part to the president’s activist role and in part to the emerging officer corps, which sought to professionalize its own ranks, modernize the platforms on which it sailed, and define its own role within national policy and in the broader global maritime commons. Jackson had built his reputation as a soldier, but he quickly recognized as president the necessity for a navy that could foster his policies. To expand American commerce, he needed a navy that could defend shipping as well as conduct punitive raids or deterrence missions. Jackson developed a clear, concise naval strategy that policymakers and officers alike could seize and execute. Jackson provided a vision for the Navy, interceded to resolve naval disciplinary challenges, and directed naval operations. The junior officers were emboldened by the populist era to challenge traditional, conservative thinking. They identified contemporary challenges, foresaw future opportunities for the Navy, and made recommendations for change, primarily in magazines. They developed a collective vision that coincided with the national literary movement that recognized America’s great national destiny would rely upon the Navy.
Supervisor: Afflerbach, Holger ; Gooch, John ; Murray, Williamson Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.745576  DOI: Not available
Share: