Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.743941
Title: Leniency programmes, competition, and innovation
Author: Alsharkas, Zeina
ISNI:       0000 0004 7231 2994
Awarding Body: University of Essex
Current Institution: University of Essex
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 11 May 2023
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis addresses two different topics in the area of competition policy and innovation. In Chapters 2 and 3, I analyse the efficiency of both national and EU leniency programmes in detecting and destabilising cartels. I use industry-level panel data to track the changes in competition intensity as leniency programmes are implemented. The success of the leniency programme is captured by an increase in competition intensity (as measured by a drop in price-cost margins). I then conduct a novel difference-in-differences DD, and a difference-in-difference-in-differences DDD, where I divide the industries according to their likeliness to form a cartel as well as their likeliness to be susceptible to cross-borders cartels. Results suggest that leniency programmes are effective both at the national and the EU level. As the results in Chapters 2 and 3 suggest that leniency programmes are successful in increasing competition intensity, I propose leniency programme implementation as a novel instrument to study the causal impact of competition intensity on innovation in Chapters 4 and 5. Specifically, I use the exogenous variation in competition intensity resulting from leniency programmes implementation to assess the impact of competition intensity on innovation. I provide two different contributions based on firm-level data in developing countries and industry-level data in developed countries. I consider both innovation inputs (R&D expenditures) and outputs (process and product innovation). The Instrumental Variable estimates of competition intensity on innovation reveal two opposite effects: the “Schumpeterian effect” where competition is associated with lower innovation activity and the “escape-competition effect” where competition is associated with increased innovation activity.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.743941  DOI: Not available
Keywords: HB Economic Theory
Share: