Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Internet and social media age : what is the difference in empathy across generations of therapists in the UK?
Author: Ghiron, Marina
ISNI:       0000 0004 7224 4602
Awarding Body: City, University of London
Current Institution: City, University of London
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Empathy is an essential ingredient in therapy associated with client engagement and positive treatment outcomes. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the difference in selfreported empathy between Baby Boomers, Generation X and Millennial therapists and between genders. Participants (N=246) completed a self-report questionnaire online survey on empathy and Internet and social media use. Empathy was measured using Davis’ (1983a) Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) composed of four subscales Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking, Personal Distress and Fantasy. Socio-demographic information on Internet based communication and social media use was collected. Across all generations, there were no observable differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking. Millennials scores were significantly higher in Personal Distress (U = 2282, p = 0.01) and Fantasy (U = 2240, p < 0.01) compared to Baby Boomers. No significant difference was found between genders across all IRI subscales (p ˃ 0.01). A negative correlation was found between generations Internet based communication using a mobile phone and Empathic Concern (rs = - 0.167, p < 0.01), as well as social media use with Fantasy (p < 0.01) as well as from Empathic Concern (rs = -0.144, p = 0.02) and Fantasy (rs = -0.187, p < 0.01) from the mobile phone. The absence of observed differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking across generations and heightened Personal Distress and Fantasy in Millennials is discussed in view of emotional regulation strategies, information and connection overload as well as increasing trends in narcissism. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Psych.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available
Keywords: BF Psychology