Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.742544
Title: Health & efficiency : fatigue, the science of work and the working body in Britain, c.1870-1939
Author: Blayney, Steffan
ISNI:       0000 0004 7229 9785
Awarding Body: Birkbeck, University of London
Current Institution: Birkbeck (University of London)
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 21 Feb 2022
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Between 1870 and 1939, ideas of health and the body in Britain were reshaped according to the ideal of efficiency. From the late nineteenth century, a new science of work emerged with the aim of optimising the physical and mental capacities of the working population. Coming to prominence during the First World War through the work of the Health of Munition Workers Committee, it reached its zenith during the interwar period. At the centre of this new science was the problem of fatigue: the declining capacity of human body to perform labour. Barely mentioned in scientific or medical texts before the 1860s, the last decades of the nineteenth century saw a proliferation of attempts to define, describe, measure and control both physical and mental fatigue. In the twentieth century, fatigue research entered the factory in the form of “industrial physiology” and “industrial psychology”. Drawing on the work of François Guéry and Didier Deleule, I argue that these sciences are best understood as technologies of the “productive body”. The worker was an object for medico-scientific intervention only insofar as they represented a constituent part of the machinery of industrial labour, while the individual body was, in turn, reimagined as a productive system in microcosm. The science of work – and the commodified cultures of self-optimisation which increasingly accompanied it in the twentieth century – promised to produce bodies which were docile, efficient and productive. This project, however, was not always successful. Scientific approaches to work were constantly shaped by the threat of worker resistance. For some workers, the physical and mental effects of work – their embodied and affective responses to its scientific rationalisation – formed the basis of an oppositional politics. Whereas for some the working body was an object of control, for others it was a site of resistance.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.742544  DOI: Not available
Share: