Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740935
Title: Dissecting heterogeneity in GWAS meta-analysis
Author: Magosi, Lerato Elaine
ISNI:       0000 0004 7230 2075
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Statistical heterogeneity refers to differences among results of studies combined in a meta-analysis beyond that expected by chance. On the one hand, excessive heterogeneity can diminish power to discover genetic signals; on the other, moderate heterogeneity can reveal important biological differences among studies. Given its double-edged nature, this thesis dissects heterogeneity in genetic association meta-analyses from three vantage points. First, a novel multi-variant statistic, M is proposed to detect genome-wide (systematic) heterogeneity patterns in genetic association meta-analyses. This was motivated by the limited availability of appropriate methodology to measure the impact of heterogeneity across genetic signals, since traditional metrics (Q, I2 and T2) measure heterogeneity at individual variants. Second, given that meta-analyses comprising small numbers of studies typically report imprecise summary effect estimates; GWAS-derived empirical heterogeneity priors are used to improve precision in estimation of average genetic effects and heterogeneity in smaller meta-analyses (e.g. ≤ 10 studies). Third, a critical evaluation of the Han-Eskin random-effects model shows how it can identify small effect heterogeneous loci overlooked by traditional fixed and random-effects methods. This work draws attention to the existence of genome-wide heterogeneity patterns, to reveal systematic differences among the ascertainment criteria of participating studies in a meta-analysis of coronary disease (CAD) risk. Furthermore, simulation studies with the Han-Eskin random-effects model revealed inflated genetic signals at small effect loci when heterogeneity levels were high. However, it did reveal an additional CAD risk variant overlooked by traditional meta-analysis methods. We therefore recommend a holistic approach to exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses which assesses heterogeneity of genetic effects both at individual variants with traditional statistics and across multiple genetic signals with the M statistic. Furthermore, it is critically important to review forest plots for small effect loci identified using the Han-Eskin random-effects model amidst moderate-to-high heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 40%).
Supervisor: Hopewell, Jemma C. ; Farrall, Martin Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.740935  DOI: Not available
Keywords: statistical genetics ; genome-wide association studies ; heterogeneity ; prior distributions ; meta-analysis ; genetic epidemiology ; LPA ; coronary heart disease ; genetic association meta-analyses ; cardiovascular genetics ; coronary artery disease ; Bayesian methods ; GWAS ; Bayesian meta-analysis
Share: