Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.735084
Title: Midwifery in general practice
Author: Livingston, George Robert
Awarding Body: University of Edinburgh
Current Institution: University of Edinburgh
Date of Award: 1904
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
In considering a large number of cases the question at once arises, what method of classification is to be followed, and how are the particular cases reported in full to be selected? A mere chronological history of the cases would be wearisome and uninteresting. It is perhaps natural that the early lecture room method of considering the subject should suggest itself as the most suitable for the purpose in view. I therefore propose to group my cases under: I. Normal Labours: 1. Unaided 2. Membranes artificially ruptured. 3. Forceps. 4. Grave complications in Puerperium, Puerperal Insanity. II . Praeternatural Labours : 1. Pelvic. 2. Transverse. III. Complex Labours.: 1. Placenta Praevia . 2. Retained Placenta. 3. Eclampsia. IV. Foetal Complications: 1. Prolapse of Cord. 2. Twins. 3. Anerz. cephalus.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (M.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.735084  DOI: Not available
Share: