Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.733437
Title: Argumentation for statistical model selection
Author: Sassoon, Isabel Karen
ISNI:       0000 0004 6498 255X
Awarding Body: King's College London
Current Institution: King's College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The increased availability of clinical data, in particular case data collected routinely, provides a valuable opportunity for analysis with a view to support evidence based decision making. In order to con dently leverage this data in support of decision making, it is essential to analyse it with rigour by employing the most appropriate statistical method. It can be dicult for a clinician to choose the appropriate statistical method and indeed the choice is not always straight forward, even for a statistician. The considerations as to what model to use depend on the research question, data and at times background information from the clinician, and will vary from model to model. This thesis develops an intelligent decision support method that supports the clinician by recommending the most appropriate statistical model approach given the research question and the available data. The main contributions of this thesis are: identi cation of the requirements from realworld collaboration with clinicians; development of an argumentation based approach to recommend statistical models based on a research question and data features; an argumentation scheme for proposing possible models; a statistical knowledge base designed to support the argumentation scheme, critical questions and preferences; a method of reasoning with the generated arguments and preference arguments. The approach is evaluated through case studies and a prototype.
Supervisor: Keppens, Jeroen ; McBurney, Peter John ; McGurk, Mark Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.733437  DOI: Not available
Share: