Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.730616
Title: International crimes prosecution case selection : the ICC, ICTR, and SCSL
Author: Mahony, Christopher
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
International crimes prosecutions have become more common since 1993, both domestically and at international courts and tribunals. The advance of this norm confronts realist state interests causing debate about the norm's status. Kathryn Sikkink views a norm as cascading when enough states adopt it to cause international influence, without domestic pressure, to procure levels of conformity. This thesis considers the degree of conformity by observing the level of case selection independence to determine whether this norm is cascading. By identifying the jurisdictional and functional elements of case selection independence, I develop a framework for observing the interface between politics and law. While Sikkink errs towards the quantity of international crimes prosecutions, I focus on the quality. This project examines case selection independence at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Special Court for Sierra Leone and the International Criminal Court, in Uganda. The project considers whether case selection has become more or less independent at these courts - whether the norm of international crimes prosecution has cascaded or contracted. In observing the various case selection independence elements I attempt to explain the observed cascades and contractions at each court. I then consider whether a cascade or contraction occurred during the period of the courts' collective design and function. The research qualitatively observes a cumulative justice contraction. The research observes a combination of factors affecting case selection independence, including shifts in power dynamics between and among weak and powerful states, increasing state sophistication in international court engagement, a shift in jurisdiction triggering actors and forums, and realist state co-option of norm entrepreneurs via endearing explanation of independence-diminishing policies.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: University of Auckland ; Institute for Security Studies ; International Centre for Transitional Justice ; Centre for International Law Research and Policy
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.730616  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Special Court for Sierra Leone ; Transitional justice ; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ; Political science ; International Political Economy ; Office of International Criminal Justice ; International Criminal Court ; International relations ; Justice Capture ; International Crimes Prosecutions ; Aggression ; Justice in Conflict ; Core International Crimes ; Crimes Against Humanity ; International Crimes Case Selection ; Power and International Criminal Justice ; Political Interference in Criminal Processes ; War Crimes ; Justice Cascade ; Prosecutorial Discretion ; Crimes Against Peace ; Genocide ; Prosecution Case Selection
Share: