Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729196
Title: An investigation of Sukuk structure risk
Author: Alswaidan, Mohammed W.
ISNI:       0000 0004 6499 4366
Awarding Body: University of Portsmouth
Current Institution: University of Portsmouth
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Despite the large and rapidly growing research literature on Sukuk risk analysis, little is known about the risk caused by different Sukuk structures. Drawing on the research literature and practice of Islamic finance, the study argues that different Sukuk structures affect the risk/expected return profile of Sukuk. Thus, risk classification schemes based on Sukuk structure provide significant insights into Sukuk risk not obtainable from conventional schemes. This is because Sukuk structure risk classification schemes link Sukuk risk more directly to the fundamental causal factors creating those risks. These links are less evident in conventional risk classification schemes. In the empirical research the deductive approach is applied. Statistical methods, including multifactor regression analysis are applied to a unique proprietary Sukuk data set provided by Ideal ratings, Inc. Sukuk structure risks will be correctly priced in an efficient market. However, the results of this study show that Sukuk structure risk factors have no power in explaining Sukuk market returns. The results of the thesis imply significant mispricing in Sukuk markets. This conclusion is in line with the comparative analysis of the risk/expected return profiles of Sukuk and conventional bond indices also reported in this study. These results on the informational inefficiency of Sukuk markets have significant implications for issuers, investors, governments, regulators, scholars and researchers.
Supervisor: Daynes, Arief ; Pagas, Paraskevas Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.729196  DOI: Not available
Share: