Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Developing an understanding of the impact of dialectical behaviour therapy on adults with an intellectual disability with emotion regulation difficulties
Author: Slater, Sean Liam Mark
ISNI:       0000 0004 6348 7418
Awarding Body: University of Leicester
Current Institution: University of Leicester
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Literature Review: A systematic review of the literature on the use of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) with adults with intellectual disabilities (ID’s) was conducted. The question of effectiveness was examined but a lack of hard evidence indicated that the results were inconclusive. Whilst acknowledging this all the authors offered a consistent view that DBT was an effective intervention for this population. Research Report: This research explored clients’, carers’ and therapists’ experiences of DBT in a community learning disability service. This service is offered to individuals with 'Mild' to 'Moderate' intellectual disabilities with severe emotion regulation difficulties and who are a risk to themselves or others as a consequence of their behaviours. Three separate focus groups were undertaken with groups of clients, carers and therapists. The group transcripts were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Similarities in experience across the three groups were identified resulting in three super-ordinate themes of ‘change’, ‘it’s painful’ and ‘development’. These themes suggest that all those who participate in an intellectual disability DBT service will experience change and develop personally and that this process is difficult. The clinical implications of this research support the use of DBT for adults with intellectual disability however it highlights the need for further adaptations to the DBT service in order to improve its effectiveness. Areas for future research are also discussed. Critical Appraisal: This paper provides a detailed critique of the methodology and limitations of the research. It provides the researcher’s reflections on the entire research process, elaborating on the decision-making processes involved and the personal impact of conducting the research.
Supervisor: Melluish, Stephen ; Robertson, Noelle Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Psy.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available