Title:
|
Modernity and Irish photographic publications, 1922 to 1949
|
Historians of Irish photography have emphasised the country's nineteenth century
contributions to the medium. However, the critical period of state formation, between
1922 and 1949, has not been considered fully. Likewise, the printed image has not
being examined discretely within the Irish context. This study explored how
photographic publications, encountered, reflected or embodied the key concept of
modernity during this period. Looking at both Northern Ireland and the Irish Free State,
it asked how were the urban/rural and the modem/traditional depicted?
These photographically illustrated books, journals and magazines, were scrutinized
using the tools of design and art history, and material culture. This approach
acknowledges that the choice of printing technique, paper, ink, typography and design
all shape how an audience engages with a publication. Their production was sometimes
hampered by external factors not least the worldwide economy; a small indigenous
market; a trade war with Britain; and limited access to foreign export markets. The
standard of design and photographic education and a conservative printing industry also
impacted upon the look of Irish photographic publications.
Key publications revealed how Ireland used photography to showcase itself at
international events, such as the Eucharistic Congress of 1932, and the New York
World's Fair of 1939. Whilst an examination of official tourist publications showed that
tropes such as the 'cottage landscape' and the 'Irish colleen' were presented
photographically and re-packaged for both an external and internal audience. The use of
photography in the portrayal of the Belfast blitz of 1941 highlights the Northern state's
concerns about its self-identity. The vibrancy of Ireland's engagement with photography
was also reflected by amateur photographic practice, as evidenced in a close reading of
an Irish photographic monthly, The Camera. Throughout this period essentialist
tendencies, which mined the past and preferenced the rural, ran concurrently with
forward-looking agendas and limited modernisation. The photographic publications
considered within this study reflect this complex engagement with modernity.
|