Title:
|
Assessing functional ability in patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis : an assessment of measures of function in hip and knee joint replacement
|
Introduction/Background: Outcomes assessment in orthopaedics has advanced
over the last decade. There are various different methods that can be used in a
clinical setting to assess function and pain. During a clinical consultation, a simple,
quick and restricted history, examination and review of investigations can be
undertaken.
Aim: I wished to ascertain whether function improved as a result of knee or hip joint
replacement, and which of the commonly used existing methods of assessing
function are of most value in this context.
Methods: To achieve this aim, I recruited a broad spectrum of patients about to
undergo primary or revision surgery for hip (n=42) or knee (n=51) joint disease. The
study design was an observational cohort study, with data collection points pre-operatively
and at 3 months post-operatively.
Results: Most participants had less pain and better function 3 months after surgery
than pre-operatively. However, the mean scores obscured the fact that several
participants showed no improvement or worsening on some of the scores.
Participants with the worst functional scores at baseline were most likely to improve.
Performance tests showed less overall improvement than self-assessment
measures. Overall walking times correlate well with all the other scores, with the
exception of the Short Form-12 mental component score and American Knee
Society Knee Score. However, in hip participants those with the best Harris Hip
Scores did not have the best walking times, or the best Western Ontario and
McMaster Arthritis Index or best Short Form-12 scores. Flexion beyond 90 degrees
did not correlate with functional scores at the hip. Both inter and intra-rater reliability
findings were good for both the Harris Hip Score and American Knee society score.
Conclusions: Differences are identified in the outcome between different health
status instruments commonly used in assessing function by self report
questionnaires, surgeon based and performance based assessments. More
research is needed to identify either the best method or more likely different
instruments to identify important specific domains after hip and knee joint surgery.
|