Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Saying nothing : in defence of syntactic and semantic underdetermination
Author: Bowker, Mark
ISNI:       0000 0004 5914 8026
Awarding Body: University of St Andrews
Current Institution: University of St Andrews
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
According to the Encoding Model, speakers communicate by encoding the propositions they want to communicate into sentences, in accordance with the conventions of a language L. By uttering a sentence that encodes p, the speaker says that p. Communication is successful only if the audience identifies the proposition that the speaker intends to communicate, which is achieved by decoding the uttered sentence in accordance with the conventions of L. A consequence of the Encoding Model has been the proliferation of underdetermination arguments, each of which concludes against some linguistic theory T, on the grounds that, were T true, audiences would be unable to know what was said by utterances of some particular linguistic form, and therefore unable to know what speakers intended to communicate by these utterance. The result, if we accept the conclusion of these arguments, is radical restriction of the domain of viable linguistic theory. This Thesis defends an alternative model according to which there need be nothing encoded in an uttered sentence – nothing that is said by its utterance – for the audience to retrieve. Rather, there are indefinitely many ways to interpret uttered sentences – indefinitely many routes to the propositions that speaker intend to communicate – which proceed through different interpretations of what is said.
Supervisor: Greenough, Patrick ; Dever, Josh ; Egan, Andy ; Cappelen, Herman Sponsor: Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Underdetermination ; Communication ; Context ; P123.B7 ; Underdetermination (Theory of knowledge) ; Language and languages--Philosophy ; Context (Linguistics)