Title:
|
Students as neo-institutional actors : a comparative case study of how German and English undergraduates understand, experience and negotiate higher education
|
A great deal of scholarly research describes substantial shifts in higher
education policy over the past fifteen to twenty years. Against the backdrop of
a global knowledge economy, governments and supranational organisations
are seeking to harness higher education more closely to economic goals.
Trends associated with this shift include the rise of target-driven, performance-based
governance structures, as well as increased private tuition and research
funding. The adoption of policies in this vein can be seen worldwide, but there
is still a great deal of national unevenness. Much of the commentary and
analysis of these trends is critical/normative, perceiving them as unwelcome
moves away from the sector's traditional missions and towards an excessive
instrumentalism of university activity. There is, though, relatively little
research that empirically explores student perspectives of how universities
operate - perhaps should operate - or how students make decisions in
relation to higher education.
This study involves in-depth, semi-structured interviews with undergraduate
students at two research-intensive universities, one in Germany, the other in
England. These countries have responded to knowledge economy discourses
in somewhat contrasting ways, and the conditions in which universities and
their constituents are situated differ accordingly. Applying a theoretical model
based on a form of socio-historical neo-institutionalism, actors' - in this case
students' - action is seen as the result of an internal relationship between
three areas: personal understandings of context, identity, and decision-making
rationales. Each of these themes is explored and then combined through the
participants' accounts to develop overlapping but also somewhat distinctive
images of studenthood. This thesis seeks to show how, and how far, this is
attributable to differences between the national university systems. Within
this, evidence will be presented to show how this is mediated at the
(nationally-embedded) university level, as well as through individual sense-making.
|