Title:
|
Psychological factors associated with posttraumatic stress following brain injury
|
The nature of incurring brain injuries, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and
subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), has prompted research which considers the development
of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after such events.
However, despite the psychological nature of PTSD, previous reviews have focused
upon the injury-related and neurological characteristics of its prevalence in TB!.
Consequently, the first paper aimed to systematically review the quantitative research relating
to the psychological and psychosocial variables associated with PTSD symptoms after TBI in
civilian adults. A detailed search retrieved 28 articles, which subsequently underwent a
thorough quality assessment, as well as the extraction of relevant data. The results
highlighted several psychological and psychosocial variables associated with PTSD after
TB!. Moreover, the results demonstrated the importance of addressing psychological and
psychosocial factors within psychological therapy of PTSD after TB!. Limitations of the
literature are discussed, including the fact that little research has been framed within
psychological theory.
In light of this, the second paper aimed to examine the psychological processes
underlying PTSD after brain injury. Moreover, a study was conducted which assessed
whether metacognitive processes correlated with, and predicted, posttraumatic stress
symptom (PTSS) severity in individuals who had sustained a TBI (n = 47) or SAH (n = 93).
Participants completed questionnaires related to demographic, clinical, social support, and
metacognitive variables. Correlation analyses and a hierarchical multiple regression analysis
demonstrated that metacognitive predictors correlated with PTSS severity, and were able to
explain an additional and significant amount of its variance after TBI and SAH. Moreover,
the results provide support that metacognitive variables are associated with PTSS after brain
injury.
Finally, the third paper consists of a critical review, which offers a reflective
discussion on the role of clinical psychology within the paradigm of quantitative research that
utilises diagnostic frameworks.
|