Title:
|
Metalinguistic knowledge and speaking proficiency in Syrian university-level learners of English
|
The role of metalinguistic knowledge in L2/FL learning continues to be a subject of
debate. Some researchers downplay its role (Alderson et al, 1997; Elder et al, 1999), but
others hypothesise that this knowledge forms a stepping stone towards L2 proficiency
(Sorace, 1985; Roehr & Ganem-Gutierrez, 2009). While there is a consensus that writing
and reading lend themselves most to its influence, research on its role in speaking is still
relatively thin on the ground. Empirical studies indicate that metalinguistic knowledge
has a significant effect on child L2 learners' oral linguistic performance (e.g. White and
Ranta, 2002; Serrano, 2011). As for adult L2 learners, existing findings show that
learners' accurate use of grammar constructions correlates with their ability to articulate
explicit rules describing these constructions (e.g. Scheffler and Cinciala, 2010).
The current study aimed to explore the potential role of metalinguistic knowledge in oral
grammatical accuracy, fluency and self-correction in L1 Arabic university-level learners
of English (N = 64), targeting a broad range of grammar constructions. The participants
were asked to take a one-to-one speaking test, an English placement test, and a
metalinguistic assessment test. In addition, 19 participants took part in stimulated recall
of part of their recorded interviews. The results show that there is a positive relationship
of moderate strength between metalinguistic knowledge and speaking accuracy, and this
relationship appears to be influenced by metalinguistic-related variables, such as
perceived difficulty of grammar points and prototypicality of rules. Metalinguistic
knowledge also · correlates positively at moderate strength with speaking fluency,
represented by words per minute, and negatively at moderate strength with speaking
dysfluency, represented by pauses per hundred words. Additionally, metalinguistic
knowledge correlates moderately with successful self-correction in speaking. A
comparison between learners at different stages of L2 learning gives a piece of evidence
for durability of metalinguistic knowledge in a poorly-communicative L2 learning
context. The results are most compatible with the explicit-implicit strong interface
position.
|