Title:
|
Sticks and stones may break my bones but can words hurt beneficiaries of affirmative action?
|
Four experiments investigated if beneficiaries of affirmative action experience stereotype threat and its
negative consequences. Study one consisted of an experiment in which we simulated affirmative native action
procedures. We found that affirmative action programs which do not ensure beneficiaries of their equality of
merit and ability, can induce stereotype threat and its negative consequences.
However we recognised that the previous affirmative action manipulations may not match the forms of
Affirmative action utilized in Northern Ireland. Therefore study two used a more applicable "weak"
preferential selection manipulation. We found that this found of affirmative action did not induce stereotype
threat nor its negative consequences as these participants knew the stereotype of affirmative action was not
true of themselves.
However the stereotype threat hypothesis postulates that stereotype endorsement is not necessary to induce
stereotype threat. Study three empirically tested this assumption. We manipulated both the presentation of a
stereotype, and participants' personal endorsement of that stereotype. We found that the inducement of
stereotype threat does not in fact require stereotype endorsement.
This finding leads us to ask why affirmative action in study two did not induce stereotype threat. We
hypothesised that these participants simply were not aware they were part of a stereotyped group. Therefore
in study four we presented beneficiaries of weak preferential selection manipulations with the widespread
stereotype surrounding affirmative action. We found that when beneficiaries of weak affirmative action
procedures encounter the negative stereotype associated with affirmative action, stereotype threat is induced.
The present research contributes to the previous literature by moving the argument on from the forms of
affirmative action used, to how public discourses and presentations of affirmative action may be the true
cause for concern. Moreover this thesis also contributes to the stereotype threat literature by empirically that
stereotype threat does not depend on stereotype endorsement.
|