Title:
|
The portraiture of Caracalla and Geta : form, context, function
|
In this dissertation, I investigate the representation of the emperor's image in Rome and
the provinces of the Roman Empire. This study examines portraits in the round and inscribed
bases of emperors Caracalla (AD 196-217) and Geta (AD 198-211) and asks how and why
patrons chose to set up honorific statuary monuments and display imperial images.
I explore the process of conception, mediation, and reception of the emperor's
authorised likeness, addressing a set of fundamental questions: Who commissioned copies of
imperial portraits and for what occasion? How did sculptors acquire and copy portrait types?
Where were imperial portraits displayed and to which extent context determined their
appearance in terms of scale, material, format, and costume types?
The archaeological a.'1d epigraphic evidence is interpreted from the perspective of
commissioners, executors, and intended viewers, in order to define the ancient perception of the
emperor's persona. In the process, I bring to attention instances in which imperial images
agreed with, or diverted from, the self-image that emperors promoted through the state media.
Finally, I relate Caracalla's sculpted portraiture to the broader context of art and epigraphy and
define its place in the history of imperial representation from Augustus to Constantine.
The result is a cross-section of the visual perception of the imperial persona in a
moment of transition in Roman imperial history, between the flourishing age of the Antonines
and the troubled time of the Soldier-Emperors. The scenario described is that of a tight
ideological connection between centre and periphery manifested by the sensitivity of
metropolitan and provincial communities to changes and re-configurations in imperial policies.
Diversity in the way social constituents chose to represent the emperor shows that there was hot
one uniform understanding of the emperor's status and powers, but rather a set of
complementary "perceptions" which can be described as individual responses to a common
desire of patrons to negotiate their place within their community and the Empire as a whole.
|