Title:
|
What makes a good sports coach
|
This thesis represents a journey that began its life a number of years ago. It is an
account of that journey and records the initial aims and subsequent changes to the
research that was undertaken.
Studies 1a and 1b dealt with the identification of problems that coaches
encountered in the course of their work and that they deemed to be detrimental to
their duties as sports coaches. Semi-structured interviews (n=10) and workshop
attendees (n=67) provided data that following inductive analysis led to the
development of a taxonomy of problems with three distinct dimensions and seven
distinct categories into which all of the responses sat. The categories were
Athletes' Personal Issues; Athletes' Status Determinants; Coaches' Personal
Issues; Coaches' Perceptions of Self; Specifics of Coaching Practice; Sports
Organisational Issues and; Sports Institutional Issues. While providing a tool
through which discussions and developments of coach education programmes
might be directed, it was felt that further work was needed to develop the
taxonomy and also to illuminate what a coach does through a theoretical
framework. To this end a second study was designed.
Study 2 employed the Critical Incident Technique to elicit details of real-life
problems encountered by coaches and identify what they did to resolve the
incidents. Twenty coaches participated in semi-structured interviews and ninety five
took part in workshops to provide the data. Dewey's Theory of Knowledge was
used as an instrument through which transcripts were analysed. This study
resulted in the validation of much of the taxonomy at the higher levels of
categorisation but found some ambiguities at the raw data level. The study also
affirmed that coaches undertake a process of problem solving that accorded with
that of Dewey's (1938) Theory of Knowledge. Key to this process was the
interaction between the coach and his/her environment through which ACTION as
thinking was demonstrated.
This work has added to the knowledge of coaching practice by illuminating what
disturbances a coach has to deal with in the course of his or her duties, how those
issues get resolved, and the justification for such resolution in terms of the
knowledge base utilised by the coach. It has also extended the theoretical base
that is gradually building around this embryonic profession.
|