Title:
|
Adolescent attachment style, rational schemas and psychopathology in the context of developmental adversity
|
Background: Despite converging areas of research highlighting adolescence as a
critical phase of reorganization of the attachment system, social cognition and the
emergence of psychopathology, no published study has examined the relationship of
these factors together in the context of developmental adversity.
Objectives: The proposed study sought to investigate relationships between
developmental adversity, attachment style, psychopathology symptoms and narrative
responses to depictions of ambiguous interpersonal scenarios.
Design: The study employs a cross-sectional design utilising both quantitative and
qualitative data.
Methods: Adolescents with known exposure to developmental adversity (N=66) were
compared to typically developing adolescents (N=58) on self-report measures of
attachment and psychopathology. Narrative data acquired for' each participant were
coded according to a social cognition and object relations scale. The narrative data
consisted of participant responses to line drawings that depicted ambiguous
interpersonal scenarios
Results: Results showed that compared to their typically developing peers, adolescents
with a history of developmental adversity were characterized by i) higher levels of
attachment insecurity ii) narratives marked by reduced representational complexity and
differentiation, increased negative expectations about relationships, increased negative'
affect, more attributions of hostile intent, and expectations that aggression would be
poorly modulated and iii) higher levels of self-reported symptoms of current
psychopathology. Further, attachment insecurity was found to significantly mediate the
relationship between developmental adversity and current psychopathology.
Conclusion: Results add to current understanding of the relationship between the
experience of developmental adversity and attachment style in adolescence and
illustrate how these factors are related to adolescents' expectations regarding
ambiguous interpersonal situations. Clinical implications regarding engagement are
discussed.
|