Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Evaluating computational creativity : a standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems and its application
Author: Jordanous, Anna Katerina
ISNI:       0000 0004 2739 1697
Awarding Body: University of Sussex
Current Institution: University of Sussex
Date of Award: 2013
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
This thesis proposes SPECS: a Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems. No methodology has been accepted as standard for evaluating the creativity of a system in the field of computational creativity and the multi-faceted and subjective nature of creativity generates substantial definitional issues. Evaluative practice has developed a general lack of rigour and systematicity, hindering research progress. SPECS is a standardised and systematic methodology for evaluating computational creativity. It is flexible enough to be applied to a variety of different types of creative system and adaptable to specific demands in different types of creativity. In the three-stage process of evaluation, researchers are required to be specific about what creativity entails in the domain they work in and what standards they test a system's creativity by. To assist researchers, definitional issues are investigated and a set of components representing aspects of creativity is presented, which was empirically derived using computational linguistics analysis. These components are recommended for use within SPECS, being offered as a general definition of creativity that can be customised to account for any specific priorities for creativity in a given domain. SPECS is applied in a case study for detailed comparisons of the creativity of three musical improvisation systems, identifying which systems are more creative than others and why. In a second case study, SPECS is used to capture initial impressions on the creativity of systems presented at a 2011 computational creativity research event. Five systems performing different creative tasks are compared and contrasted. These case studies exemplify the valuable information that can be obtained on a system's strengths and weaknesses. SPECS gives researchers vital feedback for improving their systems' creativity, informing further progress in computational creativity research.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available
Keywords: B0105.C74 Creativity ; MT0040 Composition. Elements and techniques of music ; TA0168 Systems engineering ; TJ0210.2 Mechanical devices and figures. Automata. Ingenious mechanisms. Robots (General)