Title:
|
From drill to doctrine : forging the British Army's tactics 1897-1909
|
Abstract. From Drill to Doctrine. Forging the British Army's Tactics 1897-1909
This thesis examines the development of the Army's tactics from the 1897-8
"l Frontier Campaigns until the publication of Field Service Regulations (FSRs) 1909.-
It scrutinises how the 3 tactical factors of firepower, mobility and protection,
together with experience from the NW Frontier, the South African War and
Manchuria caused British tactics to develop. The thesis shows that the Army's
attitude towards low-level initiative developed significantly. Increased firepower
made tactical extension essential. This prevented commanders controlling and made
subordinate initiative vital. Developing initiative among subordinates caused the
Army's disciplinary, educational and training systems to alter.
The thesis finally examines doctrine's development, a system of fundamental
principles designed to guide commanders, who now had to use initiative, in
increasingly complex combat. This was caused by greater firepower, longer ranges,
smokeless ammunition and wider extensions. This thesis demonstrates that the Army
developed doctrine in the modem sense. Consequently changes occurred in the staff
system, professional education and general training.
The thesis argues that the Army's firepower grew quantitatively and
qualitatively with the introduction of independent and Indirect Fire. Weapons were
now developed doctrinally. The Army attached great significance to mobility and
manoeuvre, seeing these as the means whereby it could defeat superior numbers.
Cavalry roles developed to stress operational level manoeuvre rather than battlefield
shock. It examines protection, arguing that the need for tactical extension and
fieldcraft, both impelled by greater firepower, enforced initiative.
The thesis argues that contemporaries felt that the 3 wars all taught broadly
2 All other abbreviations are in the Glossary similar lessons and that the resulting doctrine matched the short war which armies
expected.
|