Title:
|
Visualising mental illness : gender, medicine and visual media, c.1850-1910
|
The history of madness is populated by mad women and yet, the visual record of madness is
bursting with images of madmen alongside the familiar 'Ophelias' and hysterics. This thesis
uses patient photographs to examine how patient identities were constructed and represented in
the second half of the nineteenth century. It considers the effects of gender, class and medical
discourses on how patients were constituted by images. It seeks to explain the effects of patient
photography and the ways in which the medical encounter between doctor-photographer and
psychiatric patient was visualised. By so doing it sheds light on photographic practices within
Victorian institutions, the relationship between photography and medicine, and the various ways
in which photography represented gendered mentally ill patients.
The thesis draws together histories of madness and photography by exammmg
photographs of patients diagnosed with mental conditions, produced from c.1850 to 1910. It is
organised according to 'institution' and considers the photographs contained in British
textbooks, British and French medical journals and the medical case books from two British
asylums. The photographs they contain are analysed in the context of earlier attempts to
visualise the insane in the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth century, and in the light of nonmedical
photography practised in commercial studio or family environments.
Psychiatric photographs were produced in vast numbers but their style, mode of
production and display and, crucially, the patient identities they represent, are far from
standardised or indeed predictable. This variety reflects the different priorities of the
photographers, the type of patient being photographed and the contemporaneous photographic
practices of individual institutions. The visual connections and differences between several
types of photograph are discussed, as is their impact on the identity of the subject. It is argued
that only by considering images from a variety of sources can the role and effect of photography
in this context begin to be understood more fully.
|