Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.538615
Title: Participation in international human rights law : a comparison of theory and practice
Author: Secker, Emilie Elizabeth
ISNI:       0000 0004 2704 5137
Awarding Body: Lancaster University
Current Institution: Lancaster University
Date of Award: 2008
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis is an exploration of the relationship between participation and international human rights law. It places participation in a human rights context through examining the concept of participation, and determining what types of participation are most appropriate for human rights. In order to do this it establishes and applies a four-point analytical structure of the modes, purposes, feasibility and norms of participation. The thesis compares the types of participation required in theory by human rights to the practices of human rights. It considers what kinds of participation are reflected in principles of international human rights law, through examining both the rights which explicitly protect forms of participation, and principles which enable the enjoyment of such rights. It then examines the ways in which participation is manifested in structures of human rights law-making, paying particular attention to the role of non-governmental organisations. The substantive analysis finally examines the forms of participation reflected in structures of access to human rights mechanisms, focussing on individual access to complaints procedures. This examination of participation in the principles and structures of international human rights law facilitates the identification of significant contradictions between participation in human rights theory and human rights practice. Finally, potential solutions to these discrepancies are briefly examined.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.538615  DOI: Not available
Share: