Title:
|
Destabilising the discourse of vivisection : a Foucauldian archaeology/genealogy of human/nonhuman animal association
|
Building on the theoretical/methodological approach to history and historical
investigation evident in the work of Michel Foucault, the thesis takes the form of an
archaeology/genealogy of human/nonhuman animal association, placing a particular
focus on the practice of vivisection. The first chapter examines the
theoretical/methodological approach taken by Foucault in his archaeological and
genealogical analyses. It outlines the theoretical and methodological tools that Foucault
provides, and locates the research within a coherent analytical framework consistent
with a Foucauldian analysis. Chapters two, three and four constitute an archaeological
investigation of the way in which the human/nonhuman animal relationship has been
constructed in the Western world within the conditions of possibility of knowledge in
the Renaissance, Classical and Modem ages. The historical a priori conditions of the
three epistemic formations are examined and the construction of the association between
man and the nonhuman animal and the practice of vivisection is considered within each.
Chapter five develops the archaeological investigation of the historical formation of
human/nonhuman animal association and the practice of vivisection by using Foucault's
genealogy of the Modem penal system as a backdrop to a genealogical analysis of the
dispotif of Modem vIvIsection. The historical discourse that locates the
human/nonhuman relationship within a progressivist construct of humanist reform and
rational scientific development is disturbed and the historicised justification for the use
of the nonhuman animal in the practice of vivisection undermined through the
decentring of man as the foundational freethinking subject of knowledge. The thesis
shows that the contemporary historical discourse surrounding human/nonhuman animal
association and the practice of vivisection can be rethought and reconstructed by
considering it within an analytical construct liberated from the transcendento-empirical
constraints of conventional history. This discourse, which legitimises the practice of
nonhuman animal vivisection as a result of its apparent potential to advance medicine's
ability to cure disease, is destabilised, and a counter memory constructed that identifies
vivisection as a mechanism of surveillance used to discipline the human population. As
such, the thesis constitutes an alternative history of human/nonhuman animal association
and the practice of vivisection, one that allows them to be spoken of and thought of in a
different way. The counter memory produced opens up a space from which political
resistance to the contemporary practice of vivisection can emerge, free from the
anthropological constraints of the Modern age.
|