Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.511983
Title: British scientists and soldiers in the First World War, with special reference to ballistics and chemical warfare
Author: David, Thomas Rhodri Vivian
ISNI:       0000 0004 2681 5865
Awarding Body: Imperial College London
Current Institution: Imperial College London
Date of Award: 2009
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis asks how the Great War affected physical science in Britain. It examines how graduate scientists and army officers worked together in the War, concentrating on the two fields of ballistics and chemical warfare. In these fields many previous accounts have discussed only the civilians. This study gives an outline of the various military institutions where soldiers in the technical corps (Artillery and Engineers) were trained, and where the state made, tested and stored arms. It argues that these corps had a characteristic technical culture, in which science was not studied for its own sake, but always with an end in view that would benefit the state: mathematics, astronomy and geodesy for survey, geology for public works, and so on. This was quite different from the professional values of pure science and mathematics. The thesis sees the effects of the War on science on two levels, the personal and the structural. Those engaged in war-work responded very variously: some had the directions of their interests greatly changed, so that the ballistics work accelerated the growth in numerical analysis; for others the War was simply an interruption, either a destructive one, or one that was rewarding but little related to the scientist's academic career. Several of those who had done war-work maintained their links with the military for the rest of their lives. Structurally, the state increased its support for applied science with military applications, at the National Physical Laboratory, Famborough, Porton, and Woolwich. The scale of academic experiments, however, did not grow correspondingly after the War. After the War, the Army significantly increased its research activities (though constrained by limited budgets), and incorporated university teaching in the training of its engineering personnel, initially as a stop-gap, but then by choice.
Supervisor: Edgerton, David ; Warwick, Andrew Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.511983  DOI: Not available
Share: