Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: | https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.510397 |
![]() |
|||||
Title: | Traditionality and difference : a study of the textual traditions of the Pore Caitif | ||||
Author: | Trivedi, Kalpen Dinkarray |
ISNI:
0000 0004 2676 3663
|
|||
Awarding Body: | The University of Manchester | ||||
Current Institution: | University of Manchester | ||||
Date of Award: | 2001 | ||||
Availability of Full Text: |
|
||||
Abstract: | |||||
This dissertation offers a new look at the Pore Caitif, a late-fourteenth
century treatise of doctrine and devotion. Taking into account recent
scholarship in the field of manuscript studies, particularly `materialist
philology' which focusses on the entire codex rather than a text in
isolation, the dissertation seeks to elucidate some of the textual and
cultural contexts of the Pore Caitif. It is argued that taking the entire
corpus of miscellaneous codices containing the Pore Caitif as the point
of departure for investigation can help to arrive at an understanding of
the nature and the use of this variable treatise.
To this end, a large number of manuscripts are investigated in detail.
Fresh, and in many cases for the first time, codicological descriptions
are established for the majority of manuscripts containing the Pore
Caitif and a number of other related texts. The data uncovered by this
exercise are then analysed with a view to elucidating a number of
historical ambiguities relating to the treatise, particularly dating and
doctrinal affiliations.
An appendix provides a parallel text of orthodox and heterodox
versions of the Ten Commandments Commentary from the Pore Caitif.
|
|||||
Supervisor: | Not available | Sponsor: | Not available | ||
Qualification Name: | Thesis (Ph.D.) | Qualification Level: | Doctoral | ||
EThOS ID: | uk.bl.ethos.510397 | DOI: | Not available | ||
Share: |