Title:
|
The rise of the professional gardener in nineteenth-century Devon; A social and economic history
|
From the middle of the nineteenth century to the beginning of the First World War was
the hey-day of the professional gardener. However, time has eroded the memory of
these men and many of the gardens where they worked have disappeared or have been
radically altered.
Most garden history has been written from an artistic or design perspective. No-one has
studied the lesser head gardeners who worked in British gardens and estates, nor has
there been a county study such as this which considers the working lives of gardeners
from a commercial and practical point of view. Yet research using contemporary
documents, such as the census and estate records, suggests the number of working
gardeners increased significantly throughout the nineteenth century. Private gardeners
worked in growing numbers of middle-class villa gardens, or for estate gardens which
had returned to formal planting and mass bedding. Nurserymen contributed plant
material to support garden owners' aspirations and ambitions to purchase the newest
imports or fashionable hybrids and to furnish glasshouses and arboreta. Market
gardeners supplied fruit, vegetables and flowers to satisfy the demands of a society
which had changed from being largely rural to predominantly urban and began to
specialise and produce for long distance markets.
Working gardeners were compelled to change their practices and products in order to
accommodate scientific advances which fuelled a rise in interest in gardening across all
classes of society. As the century progressed it became harder for a garden labourer to
attain the position of head gardener. Increasingly, it was a man with some education
who underwent a gruelling apprenticeship and training to reach the top of his
profession. Different branches of the trade had their own hierarchy led by nurserymen at
the top, jobbing gardeners and labourers at the bottom. This thesis discusses the growth
of professionalism of gardeners and concludes that practical training was insufficient for
success; self-education, determination, experience of a wide variety of gardens, good
management skills, and sometimes luck were needed in order to succeed.
|