Title:
|
Management challenges in a changing liner environment : an AHP approach to transshipment decisions
|
Containerisation is making the world smaller since cargoes can go to most
corners of the earth without incurring high freight cost (including
transshipment cost). Thus, containerisation, together with custom tariff
reduction, has contributed to phenomenal increases in world international
trade volume during the past four decades. In ocean shipping/transportation
networks, ports are nodes where cargoes can be stored, processed, and
transferred. How to scientifically choose a port of call, especially a
transshipment port of call, is always a great challenge to shipping
management. At the same time, major port service providers (including port
authorities, port operators) are keen to know what their customers' (i. e. ocean
container carriers') main requirements are and what they really demand from
them, since their customers' requirements appear endless their resources are
limited. There is always a trade-off relationship between the cost and service
quality in major container transshipment port services. How to find ocean
container carriers' port of call selection determinants is thus very important
and urgent from the port service providers' viewpoint.
This research employed a two stage survey, a pilot survey carried out in
Taiwan and a global survey carried out by post in the UK, to quantitatively
determine the most influential service attributes for three container ports in
Taiwan/six leading container ports worldwide, respectively, by eliciting their
importance as perceived by their key customers (i. e. global ocean container
carriers). Containers' terminal handling cost was globally recognised as the
most important service attribute influencing global ocean container carriers'
transshipment port selection decision, probably due to the increasing
homogenisation of major transshipment ports' service quality. One of the two
mechanisms Porter (2004) suggests to create value for their buyers is by
lowering buyer cost. This mechanism was perceived important by both OCCs
and PSPS. The second mechanism recommended by Porter (2004) is raising
buyer performance which was found very difficult because of the increasing
homogeneity of sellers' service quality.
In summary, survey results indicated no major perception gaps regarding the
importance of port service attributes between leading PSPs and global OCCs,
suggesting buyers' and sellers' perception of value is the same in the
container port service industry.
|