Title:
|
The assumptive worlds of academics and policy-makers in relation to teaching in a higher education humanities context
|
This thesis seeks to make sense of how academics and policy-makers think and act
in relation to teaching in higher education. It pursues this inquiry using the concept
of assumptive worlds in three contexts - the University of Oxford's History Faculty,
the University of Oxford, and the national policy environment - and explores the
relationship between them. The concept of assumptive worlds (Young, 1979) Is
situated within a new theoretical framework predicated on Giddens' structuration
theory. This framework is utilised to analyse assumptive worlds in terms of
individuals' knowledgeability which is· expressed in discursive and other kinds of
social practice. Assumptive worlds also encompass the meso and macro structures
that shape individuals' knowledgeability, and are shaped by it in day-to-day practice
at a micro level.
An ethnographically-informed case study was conducted over two years in the
History Faculty. Its selection is based upon its uniqueness and its potential for
illuminating our understanding of the relationship between higher education policy
and an extreme end of the spectrum of higher education institutions In England. The
i
University of Oxford and the national higher education policy environment are
investigated as contexts within which the Faculty operates. Interviews with
university officers and policy-makers In a range of national agencies, and
documentary evidence proVide the data for this investigation. Findings from all
three arenas (faculty, university and national) culminate In an analysis of the
interplay between their assumptive worlds.
The thesis argues that an analysis of the characteristics and formation of
assumptive worlds in academia and policy-making throws new light on taken-forgranted
practices in teaching and poli~y related to teaching in HE. The concept
extends our understanding of each arena within its own terms, and when each is
viewed in relation to the others. Engagement, in relation to teaching in higher
education, between policymakers, and university officers and academics is rare. An
understanding of the assumptive worlds within the three contexts helps to explain
why this lack of engagement is recursively produced.
|