Title:
|
The geomorphology and sedimentology of terminal fluvial systems
|
The geomorphology and sedimentology of terminal fluvial systems.
Fluvial systems operating within drylands commonly experience downstream
discharge reduction due to infiltration, evaporation and limited tributary inputs. Sediment
bodies developed within the distal zones of rivers that do not drain into the sea or a lake
(terminal fluvial systems) are currently represented by the terminal fan facies model. This
model summarises the development of a distally thinning and fining sedimentary wedge
from a coeval network of low sinuosity distributary channels as induced by the sub aerial
termination ofchannelised flow under a dryland climate regime..
Extensive review of sediment fan bodies located within modern drylands highlights
pronounced disequilibrium between planform character and present ephemeral flow
conditions. Out of eighty documented fluvial systems no convincing examples fit the
terminal fan model, including two commonly cited analogues used to support this model.
In order to fully evaluate the terminal fan concept and redress the current imbalance in
modern analogue studies, field work was undertaken to characterise sub aerial fluvial
system termination within a single physiographic province - the Basin and Range rift
complex of the southwestern U.S.A. Documentation of the potential range in fluvial style
and character within this modern dryland environment is provided by the detailed study
of seven terminal fluvial systems.
Basin and Range terminal fluvial systems demonstrate strong geomorphic form
inheritance. Fan landforms observed within medial and distal reaches of these systems
predominantly represent relic Late Pleistocene highstand delta bodies into which the
modern system is inset. Active terminal reaches operate within basin centre playa
environments where shallo~ gradients induce frequent avulsion and the generation of
composite lowstand fan bodies located downstream of lateral system confinement. These
terminal features record non-coeval channel activity and the dominance of sinuous
channel forms.
Morphometric trends distinguish a general downstream reduction in channel scale
characterised by the development of progressively narrower and shallower channel
forms. Channelised flow is maintained within proximal and medial reaches but does not
dominate distal reaches where sheetflow discharge is readily attained. Concomitant
reductions in channel capacity and competence control the volume and calibre of fluvial
material supplied to basinal environments. Progressive downstream thinning is associated
with selective deposition and general basinwards sediment fining and sorting. Terminal
reaches transport negligible bedload material and display a comparable depositional
record to that generated by background playa sedimentation.
Identified similarities with the terminal fan model include downstream loss of channel
definition, sediment thinning, fining and improved sorting. Conversely, coeval
distributive flow is not observed, constituent channels record moderate to high sinuosity
and negligible fluvial material reaches basin centre locations. Basin and Range systems
are principally responding to streampower reduction controlled primarily by gradient and
enhanced by discharge attenuation. Sub aerial termination dominates due to the absence
of basin centre lacustrine bodies; a condition forced by limited discharge supply from
catchment reaches, compounded by transmission losses and maintained by excessive
evaporation from extensive, low elevation flat playa surfaces.
In conclusion, fluvial fan landforms generated exclusively from discharge attenuation
do not characterise modern dryland environments. Selection of modern analogue systems
for use in the interpretation and prediction of ancient fluvial successions must
acknowledge the influence of high frequency and high magnitude climate fluctuations
upon modern fluvial geomorphology. Key to this is an appreciation of modern processform
disequilibrium and the identification of inherited planform characteristics.
|