Title:
|
Conceptualising the psychological adaptation of trainee clinical psychologists: the contribution of attributional style and personality..
|
Student Health Professionals (SHPs) are at risk for symptoms relating to a
range of psychological problems, i~c1uding anxiety, depression, drug and
alcohol use, and stress. It is therefore important to develop methods for
identifying individuals who might be at current or future risk, arid to establish
theoretically supported interventions. The current literature review indicates
that further research is required in these areas and seeks to provide some
suggestions about empirically based frameworks which might support
approaches to screening and intervention. Differences between professional
groups indicate the need for research to be focussed on specific groups of
SHPs, Trainee Clinical Psychologists (TCPs) are the focus of the current
paper. Previous conceptualisations of the psychological problems of TCPs are
reviewed. The example of depression in undergraduate students is then taken
as an illustration of the potential applications of cognitive models for
identifying and intervening with individuals at risk of depression and other
problems. The possible role of cognitive constructs (dysfunctional attitudes
and attributional style) in TCP experiences of poor psychological adaptation is
discussed.
The purpose of the empirical paper was to explore the contributions of two
risk factors (personality as conceived of within the five-factor model, and
attributional style), to psychological adaptation (problems relating to
depression, anxiety, self-esteem and work adjustment) in TCPs. Structural
equation modelling was used to model these relationships. The latent
personality factor of stability (neuroticism reversed, agreeableness, and
conscientiousness) was an extremely good predictor of psychological
adaptation. Vlhen stability was controlled for the contribution.of attributional
style was not significant. However given the clinical relevance of attributional
style and potential for modification it was also considered in a separate model
as a sole predictor where it was found to be significant. Implications for
screening and intervention are discussed.
|