Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: | https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.453648 |
![]() |
|||||
Title: | Policy implementation : a case study of the Polaris Executive | ||||
Author: | Dillon, G. M. |
ISNI:
0000 0001 2446 3294
|
|||
Awarding Body: | University of Lancaster | ||||
Current Institution: | Lancaster University | ||||
Date of Award: | 1976 | ||||
Availability of Full Text: |
|
||||
Abstract: | |||||
The 1960s was a decade of administrative reform. Popular and
concerned opinion was focused on the operation and organization of
government, the content of its programmes and the impact that they
had and might have had. In retrospect there seem to have been few
generally acclaimed successes. The achievement of the POLARIS
Executive, in procuring a squadron of POLARIS armed nuclear submarines
to act as Britain's nuclear deterrent into the 1980s, was an exception.
In its organization and operation, the POLARIS Executive appeared to
validate the prescriptions for programmatic and managerial success in
government which contemporary preoccupations in the study of policy-making
have generated.
Current policy studies are dominated by a productive process model
of organizational behaviour and political activity - termed here the
Programmatic approach. The sources of this approach, its impact on and
reflection in the administrative reforms of the last decade, are
analysed here in detail.
The programmatic approach is rejected as a means of analysing the
operation and success of the POLARIS Executive. Instead an alternative
conception of organizational behaviour and policy-making more akin to
"paradigmatic" activity is developed.
|
|||||
Supervisor: | Not available | Sponsor: | Not available | ||
Qualification Name: | Thesis (Ph.D.) | Qualification Level: | Doctoral | ||
EThOS ID: | uk.bl.ethos.453648 | DOI: | Not available | ||
Share: |