Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441330
Title: Structuring interaction inside firms : formal boundaries and tie formation
Author: Lynch, Susan Elizabeth
ISNI:       0000 0001 3614 4370
Awarding Body: University of London: London Business School
Current Institution: London Business School (University of London)
Date of Award: 2006
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Despite wide acceptance that internal networks are important for organizational and individual outcomes, we know little about how intraorganizational relationships evolve or how a firm's interaction patterns can be influenced by managerial action. This paper asks: How does formal group assignment influence the pattern of relationships inside firms? I explore this question in parts. First, I consider the direct effects of formal structuring. I draw on sociological mechanisms to consider how relationships are influenced by current and past assignment to formal groups, by the size of those groups, and by the nested or cross-functional nature of the broader organizational design. Second, I draw from the existing literature and consider how formal structure and two well established aspects of informal structure - gender homophily and structural embeddedness - jointly influence relationship formation and maintenance. Third, I consider how changes in formal structure affect the formation of new ties. I argue that formal influence will, in the case of certain disruptive structural changes, compete with the influence of the informal organization. I test my arguments with longitudinal qualitative and quantitative survey and archival data on formal structures and patterns of informal relationships formed between employees in a 271-person multinational customer services organization of a financial services provider.
Supervisor: Lovas, Bjorn ; Sorenson, Olav Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.441330  DOI:
Keywords: Theory of the firm ; Group communication
Share: