Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.429292
Title: Designing clinical trials with uncertain estimates of variability
Author: Julious, Steven Anthony
ISNI:       0000 0001 3593 5138
Awarding Body: University of London
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2006
Availability of Full Text:
 Access from EThOS: Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below. Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Rationale for the Thesis One of the most important steps in the design of a clinical trial is the estimation of the sample size. For example for a superiority trial, where the data are expected to take a Normal form, the sample size (to achieve a stated power) would be based on a given clinically meaningful difference and an estimate of the population variance. This estimate of the population variance is traditionally based on the assumption of a known sampling variance when in reality this is unknown and has to be estimated. The variance estimate would be derived from an earlier similarly designed study (or a combination from several previous studies) and its precision would depend on its degrees of freedom. There is a need therefore for methods to be developed to deal with the problem of estimating sample size with imprecisely estimated variances. Outcome of the Thesis This thesis provides solutions for the calculation of sample sizes that allow for the imprecision of the estimates used in the calculations. It also shows how the traditional formulae give sample sizes that are too small. The solutions given are for the calculation of sample sizes for different types of trial (superiority, non-inferiority, equivalence, bioequivalence and trials for a given precision) and different forms of data (Normal, binary and ordinal). For Normal data a solution that uses the non-central t-distribution is given, while for binary and ordinal data numerical methods are proposed. For non-inferiority and equivalence trials with a binary outcome it is demonstrated that simple Bayesian methods add value to calculations. Conclusions Standard sample size calculations are shown to have limitations. The main limitation being that no account is made of the imprecision of the estimates used in the calculations. Methods are described in this dissertation that account for these limitations. It is hoped the results would be useful to any researcher calculating a sample size for a prospective clinical study.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.429292  DOI: Not available
Share: