Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: | https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.424109 |
![]() |
|||||
Title: | What is language delay? | ||||
Author: | Moran, Paul Andrew. |
ISNI:
0000 0001 3419 4403
|
|||
Awarding Body: | University of Birmingham | ||||
Current Institution: | University of Birmingham | ||||
Date of Award: | 2005 | ||||
Availability of Full Text: |
|
||||
Abstract: | |||||
My research is concerned with the coherence of the notion of language delay, drawn
from Natural Aural deaf education. Empirical evidence strongly indicates that
children who have not acquired the underlying structures of the functional grammar
(Radford, 1990) of their target language prior to four years of age do not subsequently
develop a functional grammar; a finding that renders the notion of language delay,
within this context, empirically incoherent. Instead, the coherence of language delay
is found to reside within Natural Auralism as a discursive practice. Contradictions
between the empirical data and the discursive practice surrounding language delay
within Natural Auralism are investigated from the theoretical perspective of a version
of Chaos Theory, which I develop as model2 theory. Model2 theory is then used to
explain why children who have not achieved a functional grammar prior to four years
of age suffer an enduring and protracted language delay within a broader model2
description of the process of language acquisition, which is also critical of some
aspects of Chomsky's work on grammar, in particular Logical Form.
|
|||||
Supervisor: | Not available | Sponsor: | Not available | ||
Qualification Name: | Thesis (Ph.D.) | Qualification Level: | Doctoral | ||
EThOS ID: | uk.bl.ethos.424109 | DOI: | Not available | ||
Share: |