Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.419937
Title: What influences prescribing in primary care? : a thesis that investigates relationships between prescribing, policy and perceptions
Author: Astrom, Kristina
ISNI:       0000 0001 3431 3636
Awarding Body: University College London
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2005
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The quality and expenditure of prescribing have significant implications for patient care and public health and is therefore one of the top priorities within the NHS. However, influencing general practitioners' (GP) prescribing patterns have proved challenging. Resistance to change is influenced by issues such as the GP personal and professional experiences, the relationship with the patient and the perceived tension between primary and secondary care. The aim of this project was to investigate the significant influences on prescribing in two neighbouring Primary Care Trusts (PCT) using multiple methods taking a pragmatic approach. A questionnaire was designed to measure GPs' perceptions of prescribing influence in the two PCTs. From this study, a K-means cluster analysis grouped GPs according to their attitudes towards prescribing influence. Subsequent analysis of prescribing trends revealed that prescribing patterns were related to GPs' perceptions of prescribing influence. Relationships between national and local prescribing initiatives and prescribing trends were analysed and intervention analysis quantified the effects of prescribing change over time. These analyses showed that prescribing incentive schemes have a measurable effect on generic prescribing. Attitudes towards prescribing were further explored in-depth in interviews with GPs and stakeholders from the PCTs and the Health Authority (HA). The analysis exposed different perceptions and areas of potential conflict between stakeholders and GPs in regard to the prescribing agenda. The studies that comprised the thesis were triangulated in discussions on the influencing factors on prescribing. It could be concluded that GPs differed in their perceptions of the factors that influenced prescribing as well as their prescribing practice. The results imply that prescribing interventions need to be developed in line with the views of prescribers and policy makers. Additionally, these interventions should be tailored to different types of GPs holding different perceptions in order to optimise resource use and maximise prescribing change as and where appropriate.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.419937  DOI: Not available
Share: