Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: The 'penalty' clause in English law : a critical analysis and comparison with Jordanian law
Author: Obeidat, Yusuf Mohammed Gassim
ISNI:       0000 0001 3454 7985
Awarding Body: University of Leeds
Current Institution: University of Leeds
Date of Award: 2004
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
This thesis discusses the penalty rule in English law. Pre-arranged provisions concerning the estimation of due damages in event of the promisor' breach are of considerable practical importance. When such provisions are enforceable they are called liquidated damages clauses. However, English law courts will not enforce these provisions where they are categorised as penalty clauses. A penalty clause is a contractual provision which provides that in the event of a breach of contract the de,faulting party shall pay to his contractual partner a sum which is unconscionable and extravagant in relation to the loss that is likely to result from breach. Despite the fact that the non-enforcement of penalties seemed to be well recognised at least by the seventeenth century the penalty rule remains elusive and controversial. This thesis tentatively suggests a New Approach which in some circumstances would involve a different solution than the application of existing law. The thesis also builds upon a comparison with Jordanian law. This thesis has been divided into SIX chapters.' The first chapter examines the historical development of penalty clauses and also introduces the New Approach. The second chapter critically examines the existing test, i.e. the sum being extravagant and unconscionable, for the invalidity of penalty clause. Chapter three considers the principle that the penalty rule is only applicable on breach and the loss to be estimated for application of this rule. The general principle under English law, which gives a court no power but to declare the invalidity of a penalty is dealt with in chapter four. The circumstance where the injured party's actual loss exceeds the stipulated sum is the object of examination in chapter five. Chapter six discusses whether the penalty rule should be applied to a provision that requires a forfeiture of money already paid taking into consideration that the only difference between a forfeiture clause and a stipulated damages clause is that under a forfeiture clause the sum is paid before breach. In the last part of this thesis a summary of the thesis including suggestions for the improvement of the current law are put forward.
Supervisor: Halson, Roger Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available