Title:
|
A study of influencing factors on energy expenditure and intake
|
The subject of energy balance in humans has been well researched over the past
one hundred years. However, the reason why some individuals are better at
regulating their body weight than others is still far from clear. The aim of this study
was to further investigate the relationship between energy expenditure and energy
intake under varying conditions. The first phase involved a set of three
experiments. Experiment 1 (n=15, men) was based on expending energy through
exercise (EX)(837 kJ on a cycle-ergometer), exercise in the cold (11-13°C) (CES),
exercise with prior caffeine (200mg) ingestion (CAFF) and a control condition
(CS). Experiment 2 compared two levels of energy expenditure with a control (CT)
in 12 men (a) 837 kJ (LIE) and (b) 2510kJ (HIE). In experiment 3, subjects
undertook two tests: an exercise session 837 kJ and a control condition. Subjects
in experiment 3 were categorised into three groups according to their 8MI: lean (L,
n=6), normal weight (NW, n=13) and overweight (OW, n=13).
Analysis of data from experiment 1 showed no significant difference in energy
intake for the four conditions: 5.7(±1.2), 5.7(±1.6), 5.6(±1.4) and 6.0(±1.6) MJ for
CS, EX, CAFF and CES conditions respectively. A significant increase in energy
intake only in the HIE condition compared with the CT (p =0.028) was observed in
experiment 2. In experiment 3, energy intake for the Land NW subjects were in
concordance between the exercise and control conditions (rs=0.943, p =0.005 and
rs=0.797, p=0.001 respectively) but not for the OW subjects (rs= 0.258, p=0.394).
A significant increase was observed in 12-hour energy intake between the test
conditions and habitual for the OW subjects (p=0.014) but not for the Land NW
subjects.
The second phase investigated the effect of hot peppers on energy expenditure
after ingestion - post-prandial thermogenesis (PPT) in 17 men. Findings
confirmed that a significant increase in PPT (27%) occurred after a hot pepper
meal compared with the control (p
|