Title:
|
First sessions of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis : a description of process and a report on the development and validation of a measure of affective response
|
This research described the process of first sessions of CBT for psychosis and
reported on the development and validation of a new measure of affective response. It
used the new measure to explore relationships between client and therapist affective
response and therapy adherence, working alliance and empathy. Transcripts from first
sessions of CBT were used to illustrate these relationships qualitatively.
Study 1 used data from sixty two therapist/client dyads engaged in routine services
and an ongoing controlled trial to develop and validate the new measure of affective
response. Study 2 used data from only the controlled trial to explore and examine
relationships between therapy processes. Audio-tapes from twenty five dyads were
transcribed and rated on measures of adherence and working alliance
The new measure of affective response demonstrated acceptable internal consistency
for the total scale. Adaptations were made to the subscale structure and both scales
demonstrated adequate internal consistency. Convergent validity with a measure of
empathy was not demonstrated and test-retest reliability correlations were varied for
the therapist scale and reasonable for the client scale. All sessions were adherent to
the cognitive therapy manual used. Client and therapist affective response was
predominantly positive, empathy ratings were high and the working alliance was
good. No relationships were observed between affective response and working
alliance or between client and therapist affective response. Increased negative
affective response was associated with greater insight orientated techniques and
session transcripts suggested this was because clients were unable to tolerate more
active interventions and as a result this led to therapists experiencing greater negative
affective responses.
Study limitations are highlighted and future research recommendations are made,
specifically the need to further validate the scale and examine affective response with
both adherent and non-adherent therapy. Finally the clinical implications of the
research are presented.
|