Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.330785
Title: Some subordinate clause constructions in modern German, Swedish and English
Author: Fennell, Barbara Anne
ISNI:       0000 0001 1618 2281
Awarding Body: University of Surrey
Current Institution: University of Surrey
Date of Award: 1982
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This study is an examination of subordinate clause constructions, focusing in particular on dass-clauses in German, and where necessary their Swedish and English equivalents. Chapter 1 discusses previous definitions of the term "subordinate clause", concluding that the presence of a COMP node in the underlying structure of subordinate clauses accounts for differences in their behaviour from that of main clauses. In Chapter 2 we examine the role of primary and ancillary markers of syntactic status, which serve to disambiguate syntactic relations. Chapter 3 concentrates on the function of these markers in German, showing that this language requires a comprehensive system of surface markers, due to the potential ambiguity arising from the existence of a number of polyfunctional elements and constructions. This chapter also includes a discussion of the use of the Subjunctive, which is viewed as yet another ancillary marker in German. Resultant upon this, the verbs of Reported Speech are focused upon in Chapter 4, where a reappraisal of this type of dass-clause is undertaken. Chapter 5 explores supporting evidence from recent analyses of German, discussing the implications of our findings for a general theory of word order. We conclude by suggesting that the term "subordinate clause" be restricted in German to those clauses which display both a complementizer/subordinating conjunction and verb-final word order, the primary markers of subordination. This is a consequence of the interaction of basic word order in German and the fact that German clause-introductory morphemes are often polyfunctional in nature, which weakens their subordinating power and necessitates the use of both word order and morphological markers to clarify syntactic status.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.330785  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Linguistics
Share: