Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.254673
Title: An investigation of methods of recording the electrical activity of the nervous system, with particular reference to the occurrence and suppression of stimulus artefact
Author: Neilson, J. M. M.
ISNI:       0000 0001 3440 7210
Awarding Body: University of Edinburgh
Current Institution: University of Edinburgh
Date of Award: 1962
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
A theory of the mechanism of the production of stimulus artefact in three dimensional preparations has been advanced, in which the artefact is regarded as being composed of four major components. That it has been possible to demonstrate these four components separately, and to reduce a large artefact to below the system noise level using methods based on the theory, would support the view that these four components represent the only ones of practical significance. The theory is quantitative in that, if values are assigned to the various transfer functions involved, the amplitude and waveform of the artefact produced in as given system is predictable. It has been found that where the transfer functions involve the electrode impedances, in many cases a sufficiently close approximation to the true transfer function can be obtained by regarding the electrode impedance as either a pure resistance, or a shunt combination of resistance and capacitance. Values of resistance and capacitance corresponding to the various electrodes used in this laboratory have been indicated, and it has been shown that these can be used to evaluate the overall transfer functions of the recording system and stimulating circuit. A knowledge of the transfer impedances associated with the preparation completes the information required to estimate the amplitude and waveform of the artefact to be 130 - expected in a given situation. The lower limit of one of transfer impedances, (Ce ), is set by the earth elec- (P) trode impedance, but the other three can assume any value, including zero, over a very wide range. Since the other transfer functions, associated with the electrode networks, and the stimulating and recording apparatus, can also vary within very wide limits, the resultant artefact, being a function of all these variables, can assume an enormous variety of amplitudes and waveforms. It is because the artefact is a function of so many variables, most of which can effect a change of several order of magnitude in one or more of the artefact components, that the importance of viewing the stimulating/preparation/record ing system as a whole, when considering stimulus artefact, can hardly be overstressed. The usefulness of a quantitative theory of stimulus artefact becomes apparent when an attempt is made to reduce the artefact arising in a practical situation. Thus a proper appreciation of the mechanism of artefact production should enable the various components present to be recognised, and make it possible to diagnose which parts of the system are responsible. Steps can then be taken to improve the performance of the relevant parts of the system using the techniques and apparatus described here and elsewhere. Consideration of possible methods of reducing stimulus artefact in general has shown that three out of the four major components could be reduced indefinitely by sufficient improvement in the isolation of the stimulator, and in the common mode rejection of the recording system. Thus it has been argued that the best way in which the 'Escape' components of the artefact can be controlled is to reduce to a minimum the capacitance to earth of the stimulator circuit. The disadvantages of the conventional, passive way of fulfilling this requirement, using a radio frequency isolating unit, can be overcome by the active system using the Low Capacitance Stimulator described. It has been shown possible to construct such an instrument having substantially less capacitance to earth than the best R.F. units published, yet retaining all the advantages of a conventional earthed stimulator, exemplified in this case by the provision of constant current output pulses of up to 20 mA. Measurements of the maximum value of the escape component likely to be observed when using a conventional stimulator, were used to assess the required capacitance to earth of an 'ideal' stimulator giving escape artefacts below the recording system noise level in all circumstances. This ideal capacitance was estimated to be approximately one pF. - the value chosen as the design target in the development of the Low Capacitance Stimulator. The conclusion that this value represents the limit to which the capacitance to earth of a stimulator may be usefully reduced, is supported by the complete absence of escape artefact components always observed when the stimulator was used under normal stimulating conditions, i.e. not specially arranged to demonstrate escape components. Nevertheless, the stimulator described here is not presented as a fully engineered equipment, but rather as an experimental apparatus, constructed to demonstrate the feasibility of the active technique which it embodies. There would therefore seem to be no reason why advantage should not be taken of the possibility of further reduction in stimulator capacitance, should this be considered desirable, by using a miniature, transistorised construction, and more sophisticated servo amplifiers in place of the auxiliary cathode followers. In this way a standard of stimulus isolation might be attained which would be quite unapproachable by any passive technique. Similar remarks as to the experimental nature of the High Rejection Ratio recording amplifier described in chapter six can also be made. No doubt an improvement in its performance could be obtained by increasing the complexity of its auxiliary servo amplifier to increase its gain and bandwidth while retaining adequate stability with high 'resistance recording electrodes, but it is questionable whether a further increase in common mode rejection, already over a hundred times that of a conventional system, could often be employed. Certainly it can be said that when normal stimulation was used, as distinct from the injection of artificially large common mode potentials into the preparation, the common components of the artefact obtained with the smallest electrodes used in this laboratory were always reduced to below the recording system noise level. An additional advantage of the much higher rejection of common mode interference obtainable under practical conditions with this recording system, is the enhanced rejection of 'in- phase' potentials induced in the preparation from the supply mains, and of unwanted biological signals appearing as common mode potentials at the recording electrodes. There would appear to be other applications for such a purely 'differential' amplifier in instrumentation in non-biological fields. A system using both the Low Capacitance Stimulator and the High Rejection Ratio amplifier might be said to be capable of reducing to below noise level three of the components of any artefact likely to be met with in practice. Were it possible to make a similar claim for the Differential Attenuator Unit in dealing with the fourth component, a combination cf the three units might have been held to constitute an 'ideal' anti-artefact system. Unfortunately, there seems little chance that the Differential Attenuator Unit could ever be relied on to reduce every Differential Direct artefact component encountered to below noise level, indeed experience has shown that it is not always possible, with arbitrary electrode positions, to achieve the standard of rejection obtained in Fig. 7.3.1. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that, using non-polarizable electrodes in an artificial resistive 'preparation', a much higher standard of rejection of the whole artefact can be attained, so that the disappointing results with real tissue can reasonably be ascribed to the properties of the tissues themselves. This being so, there is little to be gained by further development of the Differential Attenuator Unite Although the combination of the three units developed in the course of this study falls short of forming an 'ideal' anti -artefact system, in the sense of being able to eliminate any conceivable artefact, it may be argued that such a system comes near to being an optimum one in which further development of the apparatus would yield no significant improvement of the anti-artefact performance.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.254673  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Electro-physiological recordings
Share: