Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.251976
Title: Intention and reactivity
Author: Astor, Katharine Tamsin
ISNI:       0000 0001 3431 345X
Awarding Body: University of London
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2002
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The evolution of the human brain, including the ability to make intentional actions, has resulted in our motor system being activated via either our own intentions or external stimuli. It is important that a balance is maintained between these internal and external drives. This thesis investigates the relationship between these two systems. Evidence supporting a distinction between them is considered and hypotheses are examined, specifically: are they independent, unitary, facilitatory, inhibitory, or is there a switching mechanism? Intentional action is studied using (i) objective paradigms: the generation of intentional actions and how this interacts with stimulus-driven actions, and (ii) subjective paradigms: the perceived time of stimuli and actions. A novel experimental paradigm investigated the relationship between the putative internally-generated and externally-triggered motor systems. The "truncation" paradigm involves subjects preparing an intentional action, which is interrupted by a randomly occurring stimulus requiring a response. Truncation, therefore, involves a balance between intention and reactivity. Seven experiments produced a reliable difference (averaging 51 ms) in reaction time between simple RT and truncated reaction time (TRT). This difference was termed the RT cost of intention. The neural basis of the process responsible for this RT cost was investigated using two physiological techniques (pupil dilation and electroencephalography) in two separate experiments. Alternative causes of the RT cost, such as delayed stimulus processing in truncation, were examined and rejected. The conclusions are that (i) the RT cost of intention is due to switch costs between the hypothetical internally-generated and externally-triggered motor systems; (ii) these two systems are not normally simultaneously active; and (iii) at a subjective level, people are aware of the response delay incurred by the switch process.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.251976  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Psychology
Share: