Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.730490
Title: Self-determination, custodianship, and synthesis : telic behavior in contemporary treaty succession
Author: Bogden, George
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This dissertation examines treaty succession, the extent to which new states take on treaties signed by their predecessor political entities. The last twenty years have witnessed the emergence of complex inheritance of international obligations by new countries, which have often invoked the practice of postcolonial and post-Soviet governments when either accepting or renouncing preexisting legal ties. Although international lawyers have perennially provided prescriptions to solve attendant predicaments in this area, the topic has rarely been addressed by international relations theorists. Through historical research, this dissertation tracks the development of and interaction between two competing telic behaviors among nascent states confronted by vexing questions about the inheritance of international obligations since the end of the Second World War. Its central findings are that, (1) during decolonization, states renounced many preexisting treaties according to notions of self-determination, aimed at autonomously defining their relationship to the international community; whereas, (2) amid the dissolution of the Soviet Union, quite divergent state behavior emerged, namely that states developed a competing approach based on custodianship to existing international legal relations. Finally, in a third period leading up to 2014, this study documents the interplay between these two purposeful forms of inheritance of international obligations, illustrating that their underlying conceptions may sometimes serve as complementary forces. Empirical research proceeds by examining dominant understandings of relevant law as well as the practice of states in three distinct periods. The conduct of states is evaluated in aggregate and through case studies. This dissertation advances a critique of recent scholarship suggesting that the practice of post-colonial states and the 1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties have become largely irrelevant to contemporary treaty succession.
Supervisor: Hart, Michael Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.730490  DOI: Not available
Share: