Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729222
Title: Resource allocation in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis : an integration of modelling and experimental approaches
Author: Westhoek, Annet
ISNI:       0000 0004 6499 5748
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The symbiosis between plants of the legume family and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia underpins global food security. Legume crops are a major source of protein in human diets, either directly or indirectly as feed for livestock. Application of inoculant rhizobial strains is common practice in many areas, as plant growth is often nitrogen limited and the symbiosis can significantly enhance yields. However, rhizobial strains and outcomes of the symbiosis vary widely. This variation has also been studied by evolutionary biologists interested in the stability of mutualisms. They proposed that plants may prevent establishing symbioses with ineffective strains (partner choice), or provide them with fewer resources (sanctioning). I studied both mechanisms, combining modelling and experimental approaches. Mathematical modelling was used to predict how plants should allocate resources to maximise growth rates, depending on rhizobial nitrogen provision and carbon requirements and on soil nitrogen conditions. The use of marked mutant strains – easily distinguishable and differing in a single rhizobial characteristic – overcame previous experimental difficulties. It was found that pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants are not able to exert partner choice, but do sanction in a more complex way than was previously established. In line with model predictions, resources were preferentially allocated to the single – best available – strain, so that resources allocated to an intermediate-fixing strain depended on whether or not a strain providing more nitrogen was available. Contrary to model predictions, there was no indication of discrimination based on rhizobial carbon requirements. The results cannot be explained by resource allocation in proportion to nitrogen received, and indicate systemic integration of information from different nodules. I formulate a hypothesis about the underlying plant regulatory mechanisms, and discuss implications of the results for selecting inoculant strains and enhancing yields in the field. Future work will rely on further integration of theoretical and applied methods and perspectives.
Supervisor: Poole, Philip S. ; Turnbull, Lindsay A. ; Preston, Gail M. Sponsor: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.729222  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Plant biology ; Microbiology ; Biology ; mathematical model ; nutrients ; mutualism ; legume ; nitrogen ; rhizobia ; evolutionary biology ; symbiosis ; agriculture ; resource allocation
Share: