Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.725662
Title: People in crisis services
Author: Percival, Robert
ISNI:       0000 0004 6424 7483
Awarding Body: Canterbury Christ Church University
Current Institution: Canterbury Christ Church University
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Objectives The study aimed to explore which discourses staff in crisis services draw on when discussing people in crisis. Further questions were; how those with borderline personality disorder diagnosis are positioned by these discourses and what the subsequent consequences are for people in crisis. Design This study utilised a qualitative design. Individual interviews were conducted with participants to generate personal and reflective accounts. Method Twelve staff members from home treatment, day treatment or acute ward teams were interviewed. Questions related to their experiences of people in crisis. Foucauldian Discourse Analysis was used to highlight the discourses used when talking about those in crisis. Results Four main discourses were present in language used; ‘medical legal’, ‘personal responsibility’, ‘limited resources for the problem’, and ‘human experience and emotions’. People with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) were positioned differently to those with other diagnosis. Staff are positioned as experts needing to diagnose and cure distress. The discourse of human experience and emotions highlighted the emotional aspect of working with people in crisis, especially those with a BPD diagnosis. Conclusion The prevailing discourses within NHS crisis services remain those of the medical model, legitimising ideas of classic mental illness and practices of medication and control. This impacts the position of people with a BPD diagnosis. Further reflective spaces are required to highlight the flexibility of these discourses, practice, and the importance of emotions raised by those in distress.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.725662  DOI: Not available
Keywords: BF0636 Applied psychology
Share: